Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2019-02-20 12:30 UTC | ![]() |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | My Account |
View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
0006331 | TestLink | API - XMLRPC | public | 2014-05-12 07:02 | 2014-07-28 20:31 | ||||
Reporter | mykaul | ||||||||
Assigned To | fman | ||||||||
Priority | normal | Severity | feature request | Reproducibility | always | ||||
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||||||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||
Product Version | 1.9.9 (2013 Q4 - bug fixing) | ||||||||
Fixed in Version | 1.9.11 (2014 Q2 - bug fixing) | ||||||||
Summary | 0006331: Assign test case execution XMLRPC method | ||||||||
Description | Based on the discussion @ http://mantis.testlink.org/view.php?id=6324 [^] , I'm opening this feature request - please provide the ability to assign a test case in a specific build to a specific user. The complete use case is described @ http://mantis.testlink.org/view.php?id=6324#c20963 [^] | ||||||||
Steps To Reproduce | N/A | ||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
Database (MySQL,Postgres,etc) | mysql | ||||||||
Browser | |||||||||
PHP Version | |||||||||
TestCaseID | |||||||||
QA Team - Task Workflow Status | READY FOR TESTING | ||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|
(0020984) mykaul (reporter) 2014-05-18 10:10 |
I'm wondering if it's not the same request as http://mantis.testlink.org/view.php?id=5082 [^] . |
(0020987) fman (administrator) 2014-05-18 12:34 edited on: 2014-05-18 12:53 |
oops (I'm wrong) is similar request written in a obscure way (IMHO) |
(0021009) fman (administrator) 2014-05-25 17:16 |
reporter does not need to monitor his/her issues |
(0021010) fman (administrator) 2014-05-25 17:22 |
method: assignTestCaseExecutionTask(); https://gitorious.org/testlink-ga/testlink-code/commit/4e1040fd888376a193983421a9c0bd4d9bb783a5 [^] Think about providing support to TestLink development |
(0021034) tehilad (reporter) 2014-06-05 10:04 |
I tried to use the new feature, by creating this method: def AssignTestToUser(self, devKey, testprojectid, testplanid, buildname, platformname, testcaseexternalid, user): argsAPI = { 'devKey' : devKey, 'testprojectid' : str(testprojectid), 'testplanid': str(testplanid), 'buildname': str(buildname), 'platformname': str(platformname), 'testcaseexternalid' : str(testcaseexternalid), 'user': str(user) } return self.server.tl.assignTestCaseExecutionTask(argsAPI) I called it with parameters of our project, and got this output: {'status': True, 'args': {'testcaseexternalid': 'x-1', 'buildid': '257', 'testcaseid': 5, 'platformid': 9, 'user': 'dabust', 'testprojectid': '1', 'buildname': '2.4.0-24', 'testplanid': '52057', 'platformname': '1 Brick'}} but it doesn't seems to work(when I try to look in the test cases assigned to me, I don't see this test). |
(0021035) fman (administrator) 2014-06-05 16:30 |
@tehilad you have to test using the PHP client because is the only code I use. Have you checked with other feature than test cases assigned to me ? |
(0021142) mykaul (reporter) 2014-06-19 11:31 |
fman - we could not work with the PHP client, but here's the XML-RPC conversation as it appears on the wire - perhaps you can see if we are missing something? POST /lib/api/xmlrpc/v1/xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1 Host: 10.76.223.131 Accept-Encoding: gzip User-Agent: xmlrpclib.py/1.0.1 (by www.pythonware.com) Content-Type: text/xml Content-Length: 774 <?xml version='1.0'?> <methodCall> <methodName>tl.assignTestCaseExecutionTask</methodName> <params> <param> <value><struct> <member> <name>testplanid</name> <value><string>52057</string></value> </member> <member> <name>platformname</name> <value><string>1 Brick</string></value> </member> <member> <name>testcaseexternalid</name> <value><string>x-4402</string></value> </member> <member> <name>user</name> <value><string>dabust</string></value> </member> <member> <name>buildname</name> <value><string>2.4.0-24</string></value> </member> <member> <name>testprojectid</name> <value><string>1</string></value> </member> <member> <name>devKey</name> <value><string>dc30c06ec58a9ed2bae519d0ad206712</string></value> </member> </struct></value> </param> </params> </methodCall> HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:24:02 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.16 (Fedora) X-Powered-By: PHP/5.3.6 Set-Cookie: PHPSESSID=bb6h36pdok0ki283tc5e0g9d93; path=/ Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0 Pragma: no-cache Connection: close Content-Length: 1013 Content-Type: text/xml <?xml version="1.0"?> <methodResponse> <params> <param> <value> <struct> <member><name>status</name><value><boolean>1</boolean></value></member> <member><name>args</name><value><struct> <member><name>testplanid</name><value><string>52057</string></value></member> <member><name>platformname</name><value><string>1 Brick</string></value></member> <member><name>testcaseexternalid</name><value><string>x-4402</string></value></member> <member><name>user</name><value><string>dabust</string></value></member> <member><name>buildname</name><value><string>2.4.0-24</string></value></member> <member><name>testprojectid</name><value><string>1</string></value></member> <member><name>testcaseid</name><value><int>52058</int></value></member> <member><name>buildid</name><value><string>257</string></value></member> <member><name>platformid</name><value><int>9</int></value></member> </struct></value></member> </struct> </value> </param> </params> </methodResponse> Anything suspicious? Can you give us some guidance on how to use the PHP client? Thanks in advance! |
(0021144) fman (administrator) 2014-06-19 11:42 |
>> Can you give us some guidance on how to use the PHP client? just open the code and provide the requested info, IMHO it can not be difficult |
(0021169) mykaul (reporter) 2014-06-26 08:24 |
One difference I've noticed is that our XML-RPC also contains the testprojectid parameter: <name>testprojectid</name><value><string>1</string></value></member> Looking at the implementation, I don't see it. Is it missing or are we erroneously added it? |
(0021170) fman (administrator) 2014-06-26 08:25 |
>> Looking at the implementation, >> I don't see it. Is it missing or are we erroneously added it? IMHO => are we erroneously added it? have you tried without it? |
(0021174) mykaul (reporter) 2014-06-27 07:08 |
Yes, we've tried without it, but it did not work either. How would the API work without it? (I'm not familiar with the DB scheme) - is the test plan unique, across projects? |
(0021187) fman (administrator) 2014-06-29 12:40 |
@mykaul: can you please explain me what is unclear on this detail for public function assignTestCaseExecutionTask($args) @param string $args["devKey"] @param int $args["testplanid"] @param string $args["testcaseexternalid"] format PREFIX-NUMBER @param int $args["buildid"] Mandatory => you can provide buildname as alternative @param int $args["buildname"] Mandatory => you can provide buildid (DB ID) as alternative @param int $args["platformid"] optional - BECOMES MANDATORY if Test plan has platforms. you can provide platformname as alternative @param int $args["platformname"] optional - BECOMES MANDATORY if Test plan has platforms, you can provide platformid as alternative @param string $args["user'] - login name => tester where there is an indication of testproject id ? Please try your best before start asking for help, or buy support if you need more personalized help. |
(0021195) mykaul (reporter) 2014-06-30 13:12 |
OK - I see now the difference: buildname and platformname are of type int - we've used both as strings so far. We can try that and see if that works for us. Is there some extra debugging we can turn on? (as we are getting HTTP code 200 OK on our calls - it just doesn't seem to actually do the assignment). |
(0021196) fman (administrator) 2014-06-30 16:45 |
documentation is wrong BUILDNAME AND PLATFORNAME are STRINGS. >> is there some extra debugging we can turn on? no |
(0021264) mykaul (reporter) 2014-07-13 11:30 |
Tried the patch for 6433 - which I now see we've had in our logs as well - but while it eliminated the error it still does not work for us. |
(0021275) mykaul (reporter) 2014-07-15 18:23 |
After applying http://mantis.testlink.org/view.php?id=6440 [^] - it works! |
![]() |
|||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2014-05-12 07:02 | mykaul | New Issue | |
2014-05-18 10:10 | mykaul | Note Added: 0020984 | |
2014-05-18 11:56 | fman | Relationship added | related to 0005082 |
2014-05-18 12:34 | fman | Note Added: 0020987 | |
2014-05-18 12:53 | fman | Note Edited: 0020987 | View Revisions |
2014-05-25 17:16 | fman | Note Added: 0021009 | |
2014-05-25 17:22 | fman | Note Added: 0021010 | |
2014-05-25 17:23 | fman | QA Team - Task Workflow Status | => READY FOR TESTING |
2014-05-25 17:23 | fman | Status | new => resolved |
2014-05-25 17:23 | fman | Fixed in Version | => 1.9.11 (2014 Q2 - bug fixing) |
2014-05-25 17:23 | fman | Resolution | open => fixed |
2014-05-25 17:23 | fman | Assigned To | => fman |
2014-05-25 17:23 | fman | Summary | Feature request: assign test case execution XMLRPC method => Assign test case execution XMLRPC method |
2014-05-25 17:24 | fman | Relationship added | child of 0006313 |
2014-06-05 10:04 | tehilad | Note Added: 0021034 | |
2014-06-05 16:30 | fman | Note Added: 0021035 | |
2014-06-19 11:31 | mykaul | Note Added: 0021142 | |
2014-06-19 11:42 | fman | Note Added: 0021144 | |
2014-06-26 08:24 | mykaul | Note Added: 0021169 | |
2014-06-26 08:25 | fman | Note Added: 0021170 | |
2014-06-27 07:08 | mykaul | Note Added: 0021174 | |
2014-06-29 12:40 | fman | Note Added: 0021187 | |
2014-06-30 13:12 | mykaul | Note Added: 0021195 | |
2014-06-30 16:45 | fman | Note Added: 0021196 | |
2014-07-13 11:30 | mykaul | Note Added: 0021264 | |
2014-07-15 18:23 | mykaul | Note Added: 0021275 | |
2014-07-15 19:50 | fman | Relationship added | related to 0006440 |
2014-07-28 20:31 | fman | Status | resolved => closed |
Copyright © 2000 - 2019 MantisBT Team |