|Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account||2020-02-21 03:07 UTC|
|Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | My Account|
|View Issue Details|
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|0002193||TestLink||Reports||public||2009-03-04 15:21||2010-02-16 02:14|
|Product Version||1.8 RC 4|
|Fixed in Version||1.9 (Prague)|
|Summary||0002193: General Test Plan Metrics - Test results according to test priorities|
|Description||On the report "General Test Plan Metrics" in section "Test results according to test priorities" in column "Test progress [%]" they are displayed numbers of tests executed in each priority and percent. But the percent values are calculated as: [executed tests of priority X] / [all executed tests] - that information is of no use in test process. We'd rather want to know what percentage of PLANNED X-priority tests has been already EXECUTED. So, the metrics should be calculated like this: |
[executed tests of priority X] / [ planned tests of priority X]
so the desirable status of tests according priorities should look like this:
Overall test priority Test progress [%]
High priority - 1/2 [ 50.0 %]
Medium priority - 3/3 [ 100.0 %]
Low priority - 5/5 [ 100.0 %]
- and thats the right info for the test manager, because he can spot the possible problems in the sequence of test execution.
|Tags||No tags attached.|
|Browser||IE 6, Mozilla Firefox 2.0|
|QA Team - Task Workflow Status|
|Attached Files|| estimations_reports.doc [^] (28,672 bytes) 2009-06-06 13:59|
aggregated_priorities.png [^] (45,340 bytes) 2009-07-30 20:15
|is there any chance for resolving this problem?|
|Sorry to bug this bug :). I guess if the priorites shown module wise that would be nice, say module1 what is high, medium, and low. this should be shown based on the pass, fail and not run.,|
Hi Amaradana! Forgive me, but I'm afraid I didn't understand what you wrote, I don't get the point. Maybe my english is not good enough? Or maybe you could try to explain your point more clearly?
edited on: 2009-06-06 14:04
I Guess this will be completly off the topic. But here are my thoughts. We generate reports after the Execution part is ove.
Now coming to the point
1. I still doestn't know how many companies follow this, But we do. Managers give estimation for the time taken for the high medium and low proity test cases. Testlink dont generate the reports before the execution part.
Solution, Every test suite is defined with high, low, medium priorities will be set for test cases, and also time taken for executing will be decided. Can we generate a report based on this metrics. Some thing like the table present in the attached file,
2. The defect you raised.
For the priorities, why cant show how many pass fail and blocked in prority wise.
Please let me know your thoughts these are just my opnions. Since say extimations are always important. If we dumped 1000 test cases into tool. again why would some one would update the same in excel sheet and do manual caliculations for estimations. It is really pain. I knew this is off the topic. But the estimation would really helpful for the project.
While adding other features I alos came across this problem.
In my development branch it looks like the attached screenshot.
It's not implmented in HEAD yet
|Cool! Please implemnet it in HEAD asap.|
|Erik, could you attach a patch and reassign to me or Francisco? Thanks.|
|This was fixed in cvs some time ago. See issue 0003060|
|2009-03-04 15:21||keeyou||New Issue|
|2009-03-04 15:21||keeyou||Browser||=> IE 6, Mozilla Firefox 2.0|
|2009-03-04 15:21||keeyou||PHP Version||=> 5|
|2009-03-09 05:45||mhavlat||Relationship added||related to 0002192|
|2009-06-02 17:13||keeyou||Note Added: 0007119|
|2009-06-04 17:13||Amaradana||Note Added: 0007150|
|2009-06-06 13:44||keeyou||Note Added: 0007184|
|2009-06-06 13:58||Amaradana||Note Added: 0007185|
|2009-06-06 13:59||Amaradana||File Added: estimations_reports.doc|
|2009-06-06 14:00||Amaradana||Note Edited: 0007185|
|2009-06-06 14:04||Amaradana||Note Edited: 0007185|
|2009-07-30 20:11||Eloff||Relationship added||parent of 0002649|
|2009-07-30 20:15||Eloff||Note Added: 0007685|
|2009-07-30 20:15||Eloff||File Added: aggregated_priorities.png|
|2009-07-31 17:22||Misima||Note Added: 0007697|
|2009-08-04 02:38||mhavlat||Note Added: 0007715|
|2009-08-04 02:38||mhavlat||Assigned To||=> Eloff|
|2009-08-04 02:38||mhavlat||Status||new => acknowledged|
|2009-08-04 20:49||Eloff||Assigned To||Eloff =>|
|2009-08-04 20:49||Eloff||Status||acknowledged => assigned|
|2009-08-04 20:49||Eloff||Assigned To||=> mhavlat|
|2010-02-16 02:13||Eloff||Assigned To||mhavlat => Eloff|
|2010-02-16 02:13||Eloff||Note Added: 0009030|
|2010-02-16 02:13||Eloff||Status||assigned => closed|
|2010-02-16 02:14||Eloff||Resolution||open => fixed|
|2010-02-16 02:14||Eloff||Fixed in Version||=> 1.9 (Prague)|
|Copyright © 2000 - 2020 MantisBT Team|